Why a WWE OFF-SEASON Is A Nice Idea, But Isn’t Practical


Solomonster answers a listener question about WWE having two off-seasons throughout the year to give its talent a break and why it just isn’t practical. Rotating talent in and out at different times throughout the year would make far more sense.

35 Comments

  1. Some of these questions could be easily answer for themselves if they just took two seconds think common sense

  2. I used to say just give them all of December off. It’s holiday time, nothing really exciting happens in December, they get to heal up, and enjoy life for a while. And each week USA can just show a best of the year matches from raw and smack down. January comes, we’re all excited to see everyone again, people are refreshed

  3. I think the best option that they can do is take two weeks off of live events, promotion work, etc. For every different 3-4 superstars each month. They still have to do the Raw's and Smackdown's and pay per views. It's not perfect but it's something.

  4. WWE has enough wrestlers in the Mens and Wemans division to give some of them time off where others can take their place for a month while the ones on vacation recharge the batteries and spend time with their families as well so I think to have an off-season isn't practical but to have some of them take time off and rotate with other wrestlers is practical that way everyone will have a chance at the WWE heavyweight titles if they really want to do that. But Vince McMahon probably won't allow that to happen either.

Comments are closed.