Joe Rogan is right; We need to get rid of judges that are used to judge boxing matches. We need a team of five or even more retired mma fighters.
damn Chael , you gangster!!
The judges let Romero lose because if he had won, he would have beaten the champ but would not get the belt. SO corruption and dishonesty. Waw, what a surprise.
Joe is getting old and his brain is fried from too much weed
It was a goddam split decision. That in itself tells you it could have gone either way. So what is with the goddam confusion over it?? It was simply a close fight – 2 judges had it one way, 1 judge the other. All this talk of 10-8 rounds and draws?? It's not as simple as saying one round should have been a 10-8. Which judge do you have assigning a 10-8? All of them? One of them? And which fighter getting which round as a 10-8? Whittaker in 1? Romero in 5? It was a damn close fight, 3 judges saw a different angle 2 out of 3 gave it to Whittaker.
Now after all that consider weight cut and ineligibility of Romero for the belt. wtf? All moot.
That's the result. Effin close! But it is a win AND a belt.
kelvin won all his last fights except one and weidman lost his last fights except one
Would of preffered ufc 226 in chicago 10x better
Judges destroyed with Shevchenko vs. Amanda, Till x Thonpson, Lyoto vs. Anders and now put the last nail in the coffin of the rules with Whittaker vs. Romero. I'm glad brave faces like Sonnen are manifesting. Congratulations.
whittaker was knocked down only two times, once in 3rd and another in 5th, i would say 5th round was 10-8 but it still owuld have been a potential draw. why people still are calling knocked down 3 times and a TKO???
Joe Rogan is right; We need to get rid of judges that are used to judge boxing matches. We need a team of five or even more retired mma fighters.
damn Chael , you gangster!!
The judges let Romero lose because if he had won, he would have beaten the champ but would not get the belt. SO corruption and dishonesty. Waw, what a surprise.
Joe is getting old and his brain is fried from too much weed
It was a goddam split decision. That in itself tells you it could have gone either way. So what is with the goddam confusion over it?? It was simply a close fight – 2 judges had it one way, 1 judge the other. All this talk of 10-8 rounds and draws?? It's not as simple as saying one round should have been a 10-8. Which judge do you have assigning a 10-8? All of them? One of them? And which fighter getting which round as a 10-8? Whittaker in 1? Romero in 5? It was a damn close fight, 3 judges saw a different angle 2 out of 3 gave it to Whittaker.
Now after all that consider weight cut and ineligibility of Romero for the belt. wtf? All moot.
That's the result. Effin close! But it is a win AND a belt.
kelvin won all his last fights except one and weidman lost his last fights except one
Would of preffered ufc 226 in chicago 10x better
Judges destroyed with Shevchenko vs. Amanda, Till x Thonpson, Lyoto vs. Anders and now put the last nail in the coffin of the rules with Whittaker vs. Romero. I'm glad brave faces like Sonnen are manifesting. Congratulations.
whittaker was knocked down only two times, once in 3rd and another in 5th, i would say 5th round was 10-8 but it still owuld have been a potential draw. why people still are calling knocked down 3 times and a TKO???
It was a draw