The UFC Policy change with flagged USADA test is good for the fighters…


  1. This is just to protect the big name fighters so that if they pop hot the UFC And USADA can make a deal behind closed doors with the accused fighter. Period. Corruption at its finest and sneakiest.

  2. Good for Fighters who cheat………………………. and fighters who accidentally ingest PED’s.

  3. I’m a big fan Chael I can’t say I followed your UFC career for years but from what I’ve watched on YouTube your a legend

  4. I doubt Chael reads these so I ask you all… isn't he fighting Fedor in 2 weeks??? WTF is he doing making videos?!?

  5. Nah this bullshit, UFC Is the real WWE now just covering there asses for the future. It's like Cormier said he's been tested countless times its either you cheat or you don't. You're a professional athlete and should act like one
    "Sorry officer I didn't know the speed limit" ( when everyone knows you should check for the speed limit) wrong

  6. "I was in Las Vegas when the Nogueira brothers first touched down in America. There was a bus, this is a true story. There was a bus that pulled up to a red light, and Little Nog tried to feed it a carrot, while Big Nog was petting it. He thought it was a horse. This really happened. He tried to feed a bus a carrot, and now you're telling me this country has computers? I didn't know that!"

  7. I could understand reasoning but consider how shady both of them been performing recently just feels like another way to get what they want.

    Yes sure credibility thing would be annoying for some fighters. But if found innocent its not like ufc going to stop employing them. And as long as they are success they will keep them on payroll. Haven’t done any research but haven’t heard of any fighter suffering too much because of drug test they didn’t fail.

  8. Something like this should have been in place as soon as USADA came into the fold. The brass didn't think just outright flagging a fighter would have serious negative impacts? Yes if a sample is suspect then for sure tell the fighter, but don't go public until it's all said and done and they know what the situation is. If there's no flagrant violation do we need to know? Especially when it takes in a lot cases an extended time to figure out. And by that point the damage is done.

  9. Very curious to see what this means in a Jones scenario where someone fails a post or pre fight drug test, especially when a championship is involved. If this was in place after 214, Cormier's career would be in limbo similarly to Jon's just because nobody knows how the cookie's gonna crumble so nobody knows how Daniel should move forward. If Jon gets flagged, does he get stripped even though it's supposed to remain secret? Is this an exception? Does Cormier get the belt back? There are situations when this could prove problematic.

  10. I bet someone big just popped and that's why USADA decided to implement this "new policy" right now.

  11. it allows the UFC to pay off USADA to protect the image of a few of the companys favorite fighters like GSP and mcnugget lol

  12. USADA is snorting coke with Jon Jones and actually injecting him the steroids after the supposed tests lol so he doesn't pop anymore, they are telling him the day they'll go with a two week notice the exact time and after all that the same USADA dude is pinning Jon jones in the butt with that trenbolone acetate, that test propionate and them turinabols. The word in the street is Jon jones is snitching on all the gold gyms in his area.

  13. WADA those

    Tested supplements which Job Jones constantly taking, ruining his career and taking him out of the argument for being the GOAT.

  14. If that policy was in place, Jon Jones could have claimed to be a clean fighter

  15. It's more like so they can pick and choose what fighters are goner get punished and Fighters with big names can get away with it

  16. Fuck usada lol let Mayweather test super low testostorone levels the night before may pac

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *